Hit Counter

Monday, February 21, 2011

Program Vs Aperture Priority Vs Shutter Priority Vs Manual Exposure

Which is better, program mode or manual exposure mode? Which will yield better images, aperture priority or shutter priority? Is manual exposure the only truly accurate way to meter? Why do camera makers include so many choices for metering mode anyway? And why does the guy writing this article write nothing but questions?

OK, so I got carried away with all the questions.

But the truth is, this is indeed a frequent topic of questions, especially for new photographers. I'm going to do my best this week to put all these questions to rest so you can feel comfortable with how you are metering.
The first thing to understand is that exposure is determined by aperture and shutter speed (assuming ISO is kept constant that is), and no matter how you come up with a given value for each of these variables, you will get the same exact exposure. And because you are using the same aperture and shutter speed, your depth of field will also be the same as will the rendering (or freezing) of motion in the image. For example, an aperture of f/8 at 1/30 of a second will give you the same results no matter whether you came up with them on your own or whether the camera helped you do it. It does not matter. Going further, if you roll some dice to determine exposure and get lucky enough to pick the same aperture and shutter speed, you will still have the same results. In this sense, all four exposure modes are equal when used to their full advantage.
So, if each can yield exactly the same results, why have all four? While each has its own strengths and weaknesses, cameras generally include all four exposure modes since all four are useful in the right circumstances. To see why, let's look at each mode in turn.

In Program Mode, the camera makes all the decisions so you can relax and concentrate on composition or simply enjoying your surroundings. Program Mode on modern cameras can in fact be quite good at picking a reasonable aperture and shutter speed to give you both an acceptable exposure and a good balance of depth of field versus sharpness from freezing motion. For this very reason, it is often the mode most beginners start with and many long term shooters stick with. But Program Mode can only be as smart as what the camera maker can cram into its programming, and there is no way it can do the best job possible in every situation. This is no fault of the camera; it's simply that only you are there where you are taking any given picture, not the engineers from the camera maker. If you find yourself confronted by the unexpected, it is reasonable to assume that at least sometimes they might not have expected that circumstance either. The camera will try to fit it to what it has been taught, but it may not always do as good of job as you could do yourself if you know how.
Many cameras also include a "flexible" Program mode that allows you to override the camera's choice of aperture and shutter speed before shooting. This will have an effect on the depth of field or motion sharpness, but the camera remains in control of exposure. If you push the shutter speed up one stop faster, it will automatically compensate by opening up the aperture one stop to keep the exposure the same.
Sometimes there seems to be a stigma associated with Program Mode since its use gives so much control to the camera. But the truth is, Program is often uncannily good at dealing with the necessary decisions. And it deserves consideration as to whether it might in fact be better at these decisions than some photographers who refuse to use it. There really is nothing wrong with Program Mode. While it doesn't provide as much control as other exposure modes, that control is only useful if you know how to use it and have the time to do so. The light can change quickly and some subjects move even quicker, so a mode that doesn't slow you down while shooting can sometimes be just what you need.

If you're game for learning how to take more control of exposure yourself, Shutter Priority and Aperture Priority are good choices. In each, you can pick one variable and the camera will pick a value for the other to yield what the camera considers to be an acceptable exposure. Thus, in Aperture Priority, you can choose any aperture you want in order to yield the depth of field you want, and the camera will pick the shutter speed. In Shutter Priority, the reverse is true. You pick the shutter speed to either freeze motion or intentionally blur it, and the camera will select an aperture to make the exposure come out what it feels is correct.
When the camera picks the variable you have chosen not to, it does so so as to render a "medium toned" result. On average, many subjects have a medium gray brightness, and this is what camera meters are calibrated to. If you know your subject is not medium toned, you can use Exposure Compensation to push the exposure brighter (plus compensation) or darker (negative compensation). You can use exposure compensation in Program Mode too of course, but I generally don't recommend it unless you have a lot of experience doing so. In Program Mode, the camera doesn't always aim for a medium toned exposure if it makes the educated guess that your subject differs from medium. Camera makers have gotten more and more sophisticated at recognizing night shots as being subjects that should be darker than medium, or snow shots as benefiting from being exposed brighter than medium, and so on. So in general, as a starting point at least, I recommend using exposure compensation in both Shutter and Aperture Priority, but leaving it off in Program Mode.

With digital cameras, I hedge this advice somewhat though since you can use the camera's histogram function to help fine tune your choice of exposure compensation in any of the exposure modes discussed so far. If you take a shot in Program Mode and anticipate from experience that the camera may over expose it based on how you feel it should be rendered, you can be more comfortable tweaking the exposure compensation, knowing that you can see whether you got it right after the shutter fires by reviewing the histogram. So long as your subject cooperates by staying still long enough, you can check the histogram, make any needed adjustments to your exposure and re-shoot.

Exposure Compensation doesn't even work in Manual Exposure mode; all it will do is mess up the meter reading, so leave it off if you decide to go with Manual.
Your choice between Aperture Priority and Shutter Priority should be based on which exposure variable is most important to you in a given situation. If you are shooting flying birds, you probably want to be sure you have a fast shutter speed, so pick one you think will work in Shutter Priority and let the camera deal with the aperture. If on the other hand you are shooting a vast landscape, you may want as much depth of field as you can muster, so pick an appropriate f/stop in Aperture Priority and let the camera figure out the shutter speed. Either way, these modes can give you more control than Program, yet allow you to work faster than pure Manual since you are still delegating some of the work to the camera. When coupled with the use of exposure compensation when needed, these two modes can work quite well.

There is one small drawback to using Aperture and Shutter Priority modes though: it's hard to switch between them. If you shoot similar subjects for an entire session, you can set your camera to whichever of these assisted modes is appropriate, but if you tend to shoot multiple subjects you might find that Aperture Priority may be best some shots, while Shutter Priority is better for others. To get from one mode to the other, you not only have to deal with the physical controls necessary to change modes, you also have to deal with the mental gymnastics necessary to think in terms of whichever you are in at any given time. After all, these two modes are essentially the inverse of each other. In one mode, you have to think about aperture but get the benefit of mostly ignoring shutter speed, while in the other you have full control of shutter speed while delegating most of the aperture decision making to the camera. Yes, switching back and forth can work, but it can also be hard to get used to, and there is an alternative that still gives you control when shooting a variety of subjects.

This alternative is Manual Exposure, and some may view it as being a bit of a heavy handed way to not have to mentally shift modes while shooting. I mean, after all, in Manual, you always have to set both aperture and shutter speed yourself. That's why they call it manual — the camera still meters for you, but it's completely up to you what you do with what the meter says. The camera won't in any way change either shutter speed or aperture for you. If it thinks you're about to over or underexpose a shot, it will tell you via the meter display in the viewfinder, but it won't step in to try to stop you from doing so.
But to me at least, having to control both variables myself is frequently an acceptable price to pay since it gives me a consistent way to think about exposure while I work. And since you generally have to keep exposure compensation in mind when working in either Aperture or Shutter Priority, you've pretty much got two things to think about no matter which mode you choose unless you go with fully automatic Program Mode. Manual Exposure forces you to contend with both aperture and shutter speed, Aperture Priority means you have to think about aperture and exposure compensation, and Shutter Priority means you will need to consider shutter speed and exposure compensation. Although not the same two things in each mode, there are two in each nonetheless.

Yes, Manual Exposure can seem somewhat like you are working without a net, but as mentioned, you still do have full use of the viewfinder's meter display. And once you get used to it, Manual can actually be easier than other Aperture or Shutter Priority since it's a consistent way to work. Manual is generally my preferred exposure mode.

But not always. If I'm working in fairly even lighting and want to be able to work quickly, I will sometimes switch to one of the Priority modes, I don't do a lot of wildlife shooting, but when I do I will often choose Aperture Priority to ensure a blurred background from a shallow depth of field, or Shutter Priority to be certain of fast enough shutter speeds. And if I'm doing more casual shooting and want to take it easy, I may well switch to Program Mode and let the camera take full control.

So when trying to decide which mode is best, consider what you will be shooting as well as how you prefer to work. When first starting out, don't let anyone make you feel bad for using Program Mode — although not all, it really is quite good in more situations than most people give it credit for. As you gain experience, try learning about all four modes so you can use them comfortably when the situation calls for each. After all, the camera manufacturer did include all four, so there must be a reason have all four available.

My 1st Visual xtvt Class

Aperture: F/5.6, Shutter Speed: 1/40sec, ISO-1000 ( Aperture Priority)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/100sec, ISO-200 ( Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/60sec, ISO-200 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/250sec, ISO-200 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/250sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/4000sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/2500sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/4000sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/800sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/800sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/2000sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Aperture: F/4, Shutter Speed: 1/125sec, ISO-1000 (Manual Program)









Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/200sec, ISO-800 (Aperture Priority)

Aperture: F/5, Shutter Speed: 1/400sec, ISO-800 (Aperture Priority)

Aperture: F/5.6, Shutter Speed: 1/15sec, ISO-200 (Aperture Priority)

Aperture: F/5.6, Shutter Speed: 1/25sec, ISO-200 (Aperture Priority)

Aperture: F/2.8, Shutter Speed: 1/60sec, ISO-800 (Manual Program)

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Week 2 : Case Study

Should you buy a DSLR or Point and Shoot Digital Camera?
 
Siti Noor Photo has registered a short course on photography and she has decided to purchase a digital
camera for the course. She already has the Point and Shoot Digital camera and now she is in dilemma
whether she should buy the Digital Single‐ Lens Reflex (DSLR) camera. Followings is her thought

“I’m using a compact point and shoot digital camera and i would like to ask it is worth it to upgrade to a DSLR camera? How huge a difference do DSLR cameras make compared to compact point and shoot digital camera? What matters the most when buying a digital camera? Is it the image quality, the brand name or the features offered by the camera?.... Oh friends… please assist me on this…”
 
As students in Visual Technology Production course, discuss in your team this case study and
prepare the information in your Blog to assist Siti to solve her dilemma.

_________________________________________________________

I’ll attempt to keep my answer brief and not too technical. My opinion for Siti Noor is Yes! you should buy a DSLR camera. Below is some guidance for Siti Noor for her reference:

DSLR Strengths


  • Image Quality -  DSLRs are generally able to be used at a faster ISO which will lead to faster shutter speeds and less grain.
  • Adaptability – DSLR’s ability to change lenses opens up a world of possibilities for photographers. While my point and shoot has a nice little 3x Optical Zoom (and many these days have longer ones) my DSLR can be fitted with many high quality lenses ranging from wide angle to super long focal lengths depending upon what I’m photographing (and of course my budget). Add to this a large range of other accessories (flashes, filters etc) and a DSLR can be adapted to many different situations. It should be noted that when it comes to lenses that the diversity in quality of lenses is great. Image quality is impacted greatly by the quality of the lens you use.
  • Speed – DSLR’s are generally pretty fast pieces of machinery when it comes to things like start up, focussing and shutter lag.
  • Optical Viewfinder – due to the reflex mirror DSLR’s are very much a what you see is what you get operation.
  • large ISO range - this varies between cameras but generally DSLRs offer a wide array of ISO settings which lends itself to their flexibility in shooting in different conditions.
  • Manual Controls – while many point and shoots come with the ability to shoot in manual mode, a DSLR is designed in such a way that it is assumed that the photographer using it will want to control their own settings. While they do come with good auto modes the manual controls are generally built in in such a way that they are at the photographers finger tips as they are shooting.
  • Hold it’s value – some argue that a DSLR will hold it’s value longer than a point and shoot. There is probably some truth in this. DSLR models do not get updated quite as often as point and shoot models (which can be updated twice a year at times). The other factor in favor of DSLRs is that the lenses you buy for them are compatible with other camera bodies if you do choose to upgrade later on (as long as you stay with your brand). This means your investment in lenses is not a waste over the years.
  • Depth of Field – one of the things I love about my DSLR is the versatility that it gives me in many areas, especially depth of field. I guess this is really an extension of it’s manual controls and ability to use a variety of lenses but a DSLR can give you depth of field that puts everything from forground to background in focus through to nice blurry backgrounds.
  • Quality Optics – I hesitate to add this point as there is a large degree of difference in quality between DSLR lenses (and point and shoot cameras are always improving) but in general the lenses that you’ll find on a DSLR are superior to a point and shoot camera. DSLR lenses are larger (more glass can add to the quality) and many of them have many hours of time put into their manufacture (especially when you get into higher end lenses). I strongly advise DSLR buyers to buy the best quality lenses that they can afford. It it’s the difference between a high end lens on a medium range camera or a medium range lens on a high end camera I’d go for quality lenses every time as they add so much to photos.

DSLR Weaknesses


  • Price – while they are coming down in price (especially at the lower end) DSLR’s are generally more expensive than point and shoot digital cameras. Also consider that you might want to upgrade your lens (as kit lenses are generally not of a super high quality) or you may wish to add more lenses later and that this adds to the cost of a DSLR.
  • Size and Weight – the only reason I take my point and shoot out with me is on those occasions when I don’t want to lug my DSLR (and it’s lenses) around with me. DSLRs are heavy and sizable and when you add a lens or two to your kit bag you can end up with quite the load!
  • Maintenance – a factor well worth considering if you’re going to use a DSLR with more than one lens is that every time you change lenses you run the risk of letting dust into your camera. Dust on an image sensor is a real annoyance as it will leave your images looking blotchy. Cleaning your image sensor is not a job for the faint hearted and most recommend that you get it done professionally (which of course costs). This is a problem that is being rectified in many new DSLRs which are being released with self cleaning sensors.
  • Noise – DSLRs are generally more noisy to use than point and shoots. This will vary depending upon the lens you use but while point and shoots can be almost silent when taking a shot a DSLR will generally have a ‘clunk’ as the mechanisms inside it do their thing. I personally quite like this sound – but it’s something that is a factor for some.
  • Complexity – while DSLRs are designed for manual use this of course means you need to know how to use the tools that they give you. Some friends that have bought DSLRs in the past few months have told me that they were a little overwhelmed at first by the array of settings and features. The learning curve can be quite steep. Having said this – all DSLRs have fully Automatic mode and many have the normal array of semi-auto modes that point and shoot digital cameras have.
  • No live LCD – in many DSLRs the only way to frame your shot is via the optical viewfinder. Some photographers prefer to use a camera’s LCD for this task. This is another thing that is changing with more and more new DSLRs having a ‘Live View’ LCD which enables you to frame your shots without looking through the view finder (update: please note that Live View isn’t perfect.

Point and Shoot Digital Camera Strengths

  • Size and Weight - to be able to slip a camera in a pocket as you dash out the door to a party is a wonderful thing. These days point and shoot cameras can be slim and light – to the point of not even knowing you’ve got them with you. This is great for parties, travel and all manner of situations. Of course some point and shoots can be quite bulky too (especially some of the super zoom models on the market).
  • Quiet Operation – this was the thing I noticed about my new point and shoot the most. Not only didn’t my subjects not notice I’d taken shots of them at times, once or twice it was so quiet that even I didn’t notice I’d taken a shot.
  • Auto Mode – the quality of images produced in point and shoots varies greatly, but in general they shoot quite well in auto mode. I guess manufacturers presume that this style of camera will be used in auto mode (or one of the other preset modes) mostly and as a result they generally come pretty well optimized for this type of shooting (as do many DSLRs these days).
  • Price – in general point and shoot digital cameras are cheaper. Of course you can go to the top of the range and spend as much as you would on a cheaper DSLR, but most are in a much more affordable price bracket.
  • LCD Framing – as I mentioned above, many digital camera users prefer to frame their shots using LCDs. Point and Shoots always come with this ability and some even come with ‘flip out’ screens that enable their users to take shots from different angles and still see what they’re shooting.
Point and Shoot Digital Camera Weaknesses
  • Image Quality – point and shoots generally have small image sensors which means that the quality that they produce is generally lower. This is slowly changing in some point and shoots but in comparison to DSLRs they still have a way to go. It’s worth saying however – that if you’re not planning on using your images for major enlargements or in professional applications that the quality of point and shoot cameras can be more than enough for the average user. Manufacturers are making improvements all the time in their technology and even in the last year or two I’ve noticed significant image quality improvements.
  • Smaller ISO range – once again this is changing slowly (my point and shoot has the ability to shoot to 1600 ISO) but in general ISO ranges are more limited in point and shoot cameras – this limits them in different shooting conditions.
  • Speed – point and shoot digital cameras were always notorious for their slowness, particularly their ’shutter lag’ (the time between pressing the shutter and when the image is taken. This is constantly being improved but the instantaneous feel of many DSLRs is still not there with point and shoots when it comes to shutter lag, start up and even focusing time.
  • Reliance upon LCD - most point and shoot digital camera rely almost completely upon their LCD for framing. While some enjoy this others like to use a viewfinder. Most point and shoot cameras have view finders but they are generally so small that they are almost useless. Some models don’t have viewfinders at all (increasingly a trend).
  • Manual Controls Limited – many point and shoot cameras do have the ability to play with a full array of manual settings and controls (or at least make it difficult to do so). They often come with ‘aperture priority’ and ’shutter priority’ modes which are great – but quite often the manual controls are hidden in menu systems and are not as accessible as on a DSLR (if they are there at all).
  • Less Adaptable - while they are highly portable point and shoot cameras are generally not very adaptable. What you buy when you first get them is what you are stuck with using for years. Some do have lens adapters to give you wider angles or longer zooms but generally most people don’t go for these accessories.









Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Bulb

Abbreviated B, is a shutter speed setting on an adjustable camera that allows for long exposure times under the direct control of the photographer. With this setting, the shutter simply stays open as long as the shutter release button remains depressed. An alternative setting common on film cameras is Time, abbreviated T, where the button is pressed once to open the shutter and again to close it.

The bulb setting is used on some cameras, including some point-and-shoot cameras, to obtain shutter speeds slower than the maximum offered by the camera otherwise.
Because of the risk of camera movement, the camera is most often mounted on a tripod for the duration of the exposure. While it's generally possible to use the shutter release button on the camera itself, a cable release or electronic remote is often used to further eliminate the risk of shaking the camera during the long exposure. The cable releases generally include a locking feature to eliminate the need to keep the button or plunger depressed during extremely long exposures.
The bulb setting is useful for the following types of photographic subjects:
·     

Aperture


Aperture.
Most lenses contain a diaphragm, a thin light-blocking plate or interleaving set of adjustable plates. The diaphragm contains a small hole, the aperture, which is adjustable in size and allows the photographer to control the amount of light entering the camera. Apertures are indicated by the f stop value, which is a relative value and does not indicate the actual size of the aperture hole.




f stop.
Also “f number.“ The relative aperture of a lens, or the numbers used to indicate lens apertures - the amount of light that a lens lets in. These numbers are a relative number and are equivalent to the focal length of the lens divided by the size of the lens aperture.
For example, if you were to take a 50mm lens with a 6.25mm diameter aperture you’d have a lens set to f/8. Generally each increase or decrease in f stop value either doubles or halves the aperture size. Since f stop values are relative to the focal length each camera lens should let the same amount of light through at the same f stop value regardless of focal length.
The usual f stop range on 35mm cameras is:

1.0  1.4  2  2.8  4  5.6  8  11  16  22

So going from f/2.8 to f/4, for example, involves a halving of the aperture size. Each number is approximately 1.4x more than its previous stop since 1.4 is the square root of 2 (to one decimal place), though since the specific numbers derive from tradition they are not always spot on. Lenses for larger camera systems such as large format cameras usually have even smaller apertures - going to f/64, for example.
This series of numbers may look difficult to work with, but in fact there’s a fairly simple way to remember the series. Just remember that the first two values are 1.0 and 1.4 respectively. Each following value then doubles by every other value. So 1.0 becomes 2, then 4, then 8 and then 16. 1.4 becomes 2.8, then 5.6, 11 and 22. (the only minor glitch, of course, to this handy mnemonic scheme is between 5.6 and 11)
The letter f is frequently italicized for good looks, and a slash is often placed between the letter f and the numerical f stop value to indicate that the f-stop value is a fraction of the focal length. eg: f/4 means that the aperture is a quarter of the focal length. The letter f stands for “focal,” “factor” or “focal length” depending on who you talk to, and the number is also often stated as a ratio. eg: 1:2.8. (see numeric ratio printed on lens.)
f stop ratios.
Numeric ratios printed on lenses indicate the largest (maximum) f-stop of which the lens is capable.
For example, if a lens has 1:1.8 printed on it then you know you can open up all the way to f/1.8 if you like. The smallest (minimum) f-stop is not commonly printed on lenses, but is usually f/22 on most 35mm lenses.
If the lens has a range printed on it, such as 1:3.5-4.5, then the lens is a zoom lens which has a maximum aperture which varies across the zoom range. (ie: it’s a variable aperture zoom lens) The first number refers to the maximum aperture of the lens at the shortest focal length of the lens, and the second number refers to the maximum aperture of the lens at the longest focal length of the lens. For example, if you have a 28-105mm lens which has 1:3.5-4.5 printed on it then you know at 28mm you will be able to open up to f/3.5. However at 105mm you will only be able to open up to f/4.5. In between those two focal lengths the lens will change maximum apertures, usually in increments of a stop or so in the case of modern computerized lenses. Whether the lens keeps a large maximum aperture through much of the range or quickly goes down depends entirely on the design of the lens.

Prime lenses only have one maximum aperture. But not all zoom lenses have different maximum apertures across the focal length range. Some lenses, primarily expensive professional lenses, are constant aperture zoom lenses, which means that they have fixed maximum apertures. If a lens has a fairly small constant aperture then you know it’s probably a high quality lens. A 70-200mm 1:2.8 lens, for example, is likely to be a large and heavy pro lens.

Film Speed.

A colloquial term for the exposure index. This is, in this context, the light sensitivity of film, rated according to an internationally defined standard.

There are a number of different historical standards for film speed, but the universal one in use today is the ISO film standard, which derives from the older ASA film standard.

The term “speed” refers to the speed at which the film emulsion reacts to the presence of light. Fast film is very sensitive to light - it reacts rapidly and so can be used in low-light conditions or with fast shutter speeds. Slow film is not as sensitive and so reacts more slowly.
There’s a complex relationship between film grain (resolution, in a sense) and film speed. All things being equal, faster film is grainier than slower film. This is because the speed at which film emulsion reacts to light is related to the physical size of the silver halide grains in the film. Larger clumps react more quickly but have greater grain size.

However, the past two decades or so have seen tremendous improvement in film grain quality and so even ISO 800 speed film today has quite fine grain. Not as fine as ISO 64 film, of course, but more than adequate for a lot of work, especially if the final image isn’t going to be dramatically enlarged.